Elections & Political Dynamics
Explore the electoral mechanics (RPA 1951), the Anti-Defection Law, and the impact of pressure groups and regionalism on Indian politics.
Learning Objectives
- •Examine the key disqualification criteria under the RPA 1951
- •Critically evaluate the structural flaws of the Anti-Defection Law
- •Analyze the electoral system choices and the recent jurisprudence on electoral reforms
Detailed Analysis
" The Anti-Defection Law (10th Schedule) has successfully curbed horse-trading but at the cost of the freedom of speech of individual legislators. Critically evaluate. "
1. Introduction: Explain the context of the 52nd Amendment (1985) and the core rules (giving up membership, defying whip). 2. Body-Successes: Provided political stability, curbed unprincipled floor-crossing. 3. Body-Critique: It has made the MP a mere 'voting machine' bound by the party high command, stifling internal democracy and debate. 4. The Speaker problem: Delay in disqualification decisions by partisan speakers (Kihoto Hollohan case made speaker's decision subject to judicial review). 5. Conclusion/Way Forward: Limit the 'whip' only to money bills and confidence motions to restore legislative debate.
Key Concepts
Whip
An official of a political party tasked with ensuring party discipline in a legislature. Defying a 'three-line whip' invites disqualification under the 10th Schedule.
Terminology
Historical Insight
Speaker's Delay
The Supreme Court in the Keisham Meghachandra Singh case (2020) indicated that Speakers should decide on disqualification petitions within 3 months.
Quick Check
What fraction of a party must agree for a merger to be exempt from the Anti-Defection Law?
Which system of election is used for the Rajya Sabha?